top of page
  • Writer's pictureTina Bryson

The Boomerang Effect

Updated: Jan 31, 2021

Every time I watch the new presidential administration, I cannot help but think of the biblical story of Haman and Mordecai. If you know the story, Haman had it out for Mordecai and all the Jews including unwittingly the queen. Haman plotted to bring down Mordecai to the point of building a gallows. The ironic conclusion to Haman’s plans is that the same gallows that he built to be the end of his enemy served as his end as he is ensnared by his own trap.

There are parallels to our current political landscape. Currently, the same person who chanted at campaign rallies, “Lock her up” and decried folks who sought immunity saying, and I quote, “When you are given immunity, that means you have probably committed a crime,” that same person is now asking for immunity.

Then to add more to the Haman comparison, the man that sits at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. in the Oval Office also prophesied that his opponent would be embroiled in scandals from the first day in office. He has instead discovered like Haman that the Truth has a way of exposing schemes. The circumstances that he gleefully peddled about his opponent is coming to fruition surrounding his own administration.

Haman was also undone by his own self-righteousness and ambition. He was a man that thought very highly of himself and would not tolerate those who did not fall in line to give him the respect he was truly convinced that he deserved. In fact, scripture records that when Haman saw that Mordecai would not bow down or show him respect, Haman was filled with rage. I can imagine that if Twitter had been around in biblical times, Mordecai may have been the object of a Tweetstorm.

But I digress. Haman was so full of himself that in his view Mordecai’s insolence had to be dealt with. And not only that, but Haman actively pursued a position of honor and respect that he believed should have rightly been his. I find it quite ironic that sometimes the very thing that a person seeks to possess, once he has achieved it, the possession of it becomes his undoing.

Haman had a position of honor, but he wanted more. However, Haman also had, what turned out to be, fatal character flaws. He was petty and mean-spirited, vindictive, vengeful, driven by prejudice and hate. He sought to use his influence to put others in “their place.” He sought to use legislation to accomplish his own agenda.

The interactions between Haman and Mordecai should be a cautionary tale. Be wary of your own efforts and rhetoric to bring down someone else, you may find that when the dust settles, you have fallen into your own trap.

3 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page